Donate

Sign Up

Contact
Us

SEARCH

Cases

IJ's Four
Pillars Economic
LibertyPrivate
PropertySchool ChoiceFirst
AmendmentOther

Media CenterLegislation

Chapters

State
Chapters IJ ArizonaIJ
FloridaIJ MinnesotaIJ
TexasIJ WashingtonIJ Clinic on
Entrepreneurship

Learn More

Websites
Ctr for
Judicial EngagementMake No Law
BlogCastle
Coalition

Publications &
ResearchEmployment OpportunitiesOur
Mission

Take Action

ActivistsLaw
StudentsInternsCastle Coalition websiteSpeakers &
Events

SubscribeIJ Freedom Flix
videosiTunes Audio PodcastsEmail
updatesFacebookTwitter
feed

Donate

<< Return to IJ's Human Action
Network

New
Jersey City Council Tries to Use Eminent Domain on Property Owners, Gets Swept
Out of Office

Sometimes you
can beat City Hall.

Michael
Monaghan has wanted to develop his property on Main Street in Hackensack, New
Jersey, just a few miles away from Manhattan.  Yet the city twice denied
two applications for banks to build on his land.

Instead,
Hackensack’s Planning Board designated Michael’s and another owner’s land as an
“area in need of redevelopment,” authorizing the use of eminent domain to
condemn and seize the properties.  “I've
stood up and tried to protect my property for the last eight
years,” he said in an
interview with a local paper.

Adding
insult to injury, this designation was completely unwarranted.  According
to Michael’s attorney, Peter Dickson, the board “did not make the Constitutional
finding of blighted, and did not have any evidence that would support such a
finding.”

Last
month, the Appellate
Division of the state Superior Court agreed, ruling
the Planning Board didn’t properly prove that those properties were blighted and
“in need of redevelopment.”   The city council intended to appeal the
appellate court’s decision.

But
fortunately for property owners, Hackensack’s
entire city council was booted out of
office.  The grassroots group Citizens for Change won every single seat on
the city council, despite being outraised 2:1.  Their slate of candidates
successfully ran on a platform against costly litigation, nepotism, and
corruption.  (For example, Hackensack’s police chief was recently
convicted
for official misconduct and insurance fraud.)
Citizens for Change also sharply criticized Hackensack’s redevelopment projects,
calling them “sweetheart
deals and special privileges for politically connected property owners and
developers.”

Abusing
eminent domain is not only reprehensible, but politically unpopular.
Elected officials should heed Hackensack, lest they face a public backlash and
lose their seats.

--Nick
Sibilla

Nick Sibilla works at IJ as a Maffucci
Fellow.

<< Return
to HAN main page

First Amendment
Lawsuit Filed by Nationally Syndicated Advice Columnist and Institute for
Justice to Vindicate Free Speech, Free Press

ECONOMIC LIBERTY

Louisiana Asks U.S. Supreme Court to Overturn Casket-Making
Monks’ Victory

FIRST AMENDMENT

Gov't Seeks to Silence Citizen Activists & IJ—Her Public
Interest Lawyers

FIRST AMENDMENT

4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals holds diabetic blogger’s
lawsuit against the North Carolina Board of Dietetics may go
forward

IJ NEWS

IJ Among Charity Navigator Elite Eleventh Year in a
Row

Email Address

Please enter a
valid email address

Institute for Justice
901 N. Glebe Road, Suite 900
Arlington, VA
22203
Tel 703.682.9320, Fax 703.682.9321
© 1997-2013